<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bret Swanson - Maximum Entropy &#187; New New Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/category/new-new-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bretswanson.com</link>
	<description>tech, econ, Web, China, stocks, Fed, energy, IP, Moore, bandwidth, exaflood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:11:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Barro vs. Krugman</title>
		<link>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2009/02/barro-vs-krugman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2009/02/barro-vs-krugman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Krugman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretswanson.com/?p=705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clive Crook has a long and lively exchange with Harvard&#8217;s Robert Barro on Keynesian multipliers, Ricardian equivalence, and economic etiquette.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clive Crook has a <a href="http://clivecrook.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/02/dismal_science_revisited.php" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/clivecrook.theatlantic.com');" target="_blank">long and lively exchange</a> with Harvard&#8217;s Robert Barro on Keynesian multipliers, Ricardian equivalence, and economic etiquette.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2009/02/barro-vs-krugman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wolf vs. Wesbury</title>
		<link>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2009/02/wolf-vs-wesbury/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2009/02/wolf-vs-wesbury/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New New Deal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretswanson.com/?p=679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FT&#8217;s Martin Wolf is beyond pessimistic on the economy. &#8220;Worse than Japan,&#8221; he thinks. But probably not as bad as the 1930s. Wonderful. He does, however, think the U.S. and other government spending binges will at least help.

But Brian Wesbury unveils a new chart showing how government spending and unemployment are correlated, beyond the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FT&#8217;s Martin Wolf is beyond pessimistic on the economy. &#8220;Worse than Japan,&#8221; he thinks. But probably not as bad as the 1930s. Wonderful. He does, however, think the U.S. and other government spending binges will at least help.<br />
<object width="400" height="300"><embed height="300" width="400" allowscriptaccess="always" src="http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/fop/embedflv/swf/fop_wrapper.swf?id=11947614&#038;autoStart=0&#038;prepanelEnable=1&#038;infopanelEnable=1&#038;carouselEnable=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></p>
<p>But Brian Wesbury unveils <a href="http://www.ftportfolios.com/Commentary/EconomicResearch/2009/2/9/unemployment_and_stimulus_ii" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.ftportfolios.com');">a new chart</a> showing how government spending and unemployment are correlated, beyond the normal cyclical boosts in recessionary government spending. This reinforces work by <a href="http://papers.nber.org/papers/w7207" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/papers.nber.org');">Alberto</a> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123249646698200289.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/online.wsj.com');">Alesina</a>, Robert Barro, and others.<br />
<div id="attachment_680" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 449px"><a href="http://www.bretswanson.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/wesbury-chart-2009-02-09.jpg" ><img src="http://www.bretswanson.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/wesbury-chart-2009-02-09.jpg" alt="Wesbury says government spending boosts unemployment." title="wesbury-chart-2009-02-09" width="439" height="308" class="size-full wp-image-680" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Wesbury says government spending boosts unemployment.</p></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2009/02/wolf-vs-wesbury/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;the worst bill since the 1930s&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2009/02/the-worst-bill-since-the-1930s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2009/02/the-worst-bill-since-the-1930s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretswanson.com/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harvard&#8217;s Robert Barro interviewed about Keynesian spending, tax cuts, Paul Krugman, and. . .
Tax cuts are bound to be better. I think the best evidence for expanding GDP comes from the temporary military spending that usually accompanies wars &#8212; wars that don&#8217;t destroy a lot of stuff, at least in the US experience. Even there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harvard&#8217;s Robert Barro <a href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/02/an_interview_with_robert_barro.php" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/business.theatlantic.com');" target="_blank">interviewed</a> about Keynesian spending, tax cuts, Paul Krugman, and. . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Tax cuts are bound to be better. I think the best evidence for expanding GDP comes from the temporary military spending that usually accompanies wars &#8212; wars that don&#8217;t destroy a lot of stuff, at least in the US experience. Even there I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s one for one, so if you don&#8217;t value the war itself it&#8217;s not a good idea. You know, attacking Iran is a shovel-ready project. But I wouldn&#8217;t recommend it.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2009/02/the-worst-bill-since-the-1930s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report from a far-away capital</title>
		<link>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2008/12/report-from-a-far-away-capital/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2008/12/report-from-a-far-away-capital/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 02:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New New Deal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretswanson.com/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Brooks at his best:
zeros have lost their meanings. The amount of consideration once devoted to a proposal costing $3 billion is now devoted to a proposal costing $300 billion. Americans have entered the age of budgetary infinity. . . .
Your humble ambassador has heard analysts casually tick off the elements of the Obama plan: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Brooks <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/12/opinion/12brooks.html?_r=1" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.nytimes.com');" target="_blank">at his best</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>zeros have lost their meanings. The amount of consideration once devoted to a proposal costing $3 billion is now devoted to a proposal costing $300 billion. Americans have entered the age of budgetary infinity. . . .</p>
<p>Your humble ambassador has heard analysts casually tick off the elements of the Obama plan: enact the largest infrastructure project in 50 years, initiate the broadest tax cut in history, reorganize 14 percent of the American economy, replace the carbon-based economy with a renewable-energy economy, restructure the auto industry, perhaps even rescue the Detroit Lions.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2008/12/report-from-a-far-away-capital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
