<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bret Swanson - Maximum Entropy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bretswanson.com</link>
	<description>tech, econ, Web, China, stocks, Fed, energy, IP, Moore, bandwidth, exaflood</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Bartlett&#8217;s Familiar Misanalysis by heem</title>
		<link>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2010/02/bartletts-dictionary-of-misanalysis/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>heem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretswanson.com/?p=1502#comment-549</guid>
		<description>Someone needs to debate Bruce Bartlett. Ive written him on many occasions and he refuses to debate or have discussions. Unfortunately for Mr Bartlett, his entire worldview is based on his extreme hate for GW Bush</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone needs to debate Bruce Bartlett. Ive written him on many occasions and he refuses to debate or have discussions. Unfortunately for Mr Bartlett, his entire worldview is based on his extreme hate for GW Bush</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Collective vs. Creative: The Yin and Yang of Innovation by Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2010/01/collective-vs-creative-the-yin-and-yang-of-innovation/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretswanson.com/?p=1461#comment-538</guid>
		<description>There is a danger in "innovation" at the core, that I hope you will address.  The central feature that makes innovation even possible at the edges of the network is that the core is essentially "stupid."  This creates independence and allows innovators to create new technology without any reliance on each other, or the network provider.  It is  simple to say "this is not always good."  It is much harder to ignore the fact that 100% of the internet's use and current technology has been built around this "dumb-core" architecture, and even harder to suggest how one could "evolve" at the core (introducing intelligence I presume) without a corresponding reduction in the ability to evolve at the edges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a danger in &#8220;innovation&#8221; at the core, that I hope you will address.  The central feature that makes innovation even possible at the edges of the network is that the core is essentially &#8220;stupid.&#8221;  This creates independence and allows innovators to create new technology without any reliance on each other, or the network provider.  It is  simple to say &#8220;this is not always good.&#8221;  It is much harder to ignore the fact that 100% of the internet&#8217;s use and current technology has been built around this &#8220;dumb-core&#8221; architecture, and even harder to suggest how one could &#8220;evolve&#8221; at the core (introducing intelligence I presume) without a corresponding reduction in the ability to evolve at the edges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Innovation Yin and Yang by Bret Swanson - Maximum Entropy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Collective vs. Creative: The Yin and Yang of Innovation</title>
		<link>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2009/08/innovation-yin-and-yang/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret Swanson - Maximum Entropy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Collective vs. Creative: The Yin and Yang of Innovation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretswanson.com/?p=1216#comment-520</guid>
		<description>[...] one side or the other. We understand that there are virtues all around. Here’s how I put it on my blog last autumn: Suggesting we can enjoy Google’s software innovations without the network innovations of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one side or the other. We understand that there are virtues all around. Here’s how I put it on my blog last autumn: Suggesting we can enjoy Google’s software innovations without the network innovations of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Innovation Yin and Yang by Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Net Neutrality, Part I: Collective vs. Creative</title>
		<link>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2009/08/innovation-yin-and-yang/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Net Neutrality, Part I: Collective vs. Creative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretswanson.com/?p=1216#comment-519</guid>
		<description>[...] favor one side or the other. We understand that there are virtues all around. Here’s how I put it on my blog last autumn: Suggesting we can enjoy Google’s software innovations without the network innovations of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] favor one side or the other. We understand that there are virtues all around. Here’s how I put it on my blog last autumn: Suggesting we can enjoy Google’s software innovations without the network innovations of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Leviathan Spam by Bret Swanson - Maximum Entropy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A QoS primer</title>
		<link>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2009/09/leviathan-spam/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret Swanson - Maximum Entropy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A QoS primer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretswanson.com/?p=1279#comment-412</guid>
		<description>[...] &#171; Leviathan Spam [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &laquo; Leviathan Spam [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quote of the Day by Matt S</title>
		<link>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2009/08/quote-of-the-day-34/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretswanson.com/?p=1238#comment-385</guid>
		<description>response from Matt Simmons:

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/09/04/oil_spin?page=0,0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>response from Matt Simmons:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/09/04/oil_spin?page=0,0" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.foreignpolicy.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/09/04/oil_spin?page=0,0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Innovation Yin and Yang by Pamala Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2009/08/innovation-yin-and-yang/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamala Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretswanson.com/?p=1216#comment-376</guid>
		<description>Excellent counterpoint to the Kessler article.  You make many salient points which I agree with, especially the one concerning the stifling of innovation.  Thanks for the alternative viewpoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent counterpoint to the Kessler article.  You make many salient points which I agree with, especially the one concerning the stifling of innovation.  Thanks for the alternative viewpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Innovation Yin and Yang by Bret Swanson - Maximum Entropy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Agreeing with Kessler</title>
		<link>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2009/08/innovation-yin-and-yang/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret Swanson - Maximum Entropy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Agreeing with Kessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretswanson.com/?p=1216#comment-373</guid>
		<description>[...] challenging Andy Kessler over the Google Voice-Apple-AT&#38;T dustup, I should point out some areas of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] challenging Andy Kessler over the Google Voice-Apple-AT&amp;T dustup, I should point out some areas of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Biting the handsets that connect the world by Innovation Yin and Yang</title>
		<link>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2009/07/biting-the-handsets-that-connect-the-world/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Innovation Yin and Yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretswanson.com/?p=1171#comment-366</guid>
		<description>[...] “Biting the handsets that connect the world” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “Biting the handsets that connect the world” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Biting the handsets that connect the world by Bret Swanson - Maximum Entropy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Innovation Yin and Yang</title>
		<link>http://www.bretswanson.com/index.php/2009/07/biting-the-handsets-that-connect-the-world/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret Swanson - Maximum Entropy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Innovation Yin and Yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretswanson.com/?p=1171#comment-363</guid>
		<description>[...] “Biting the handsets that connect the world” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “Biting the handsets that connect the world” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
